<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brad Pitt Arrives In The BMW Hydrogen 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carzi.com/2007/06/06/brad-pitt-arrives-in-the-bmw-hydrogen-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carzi.com/2007/06/06/brad-pitt-arrives-in-the-bmw-hydrogen-7/</link>
	<description>Cool Automotive News From Around The World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:45:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: e46 led</title>
		<link>http://www.carzi.com/2007/06/06/brad-pitt-arrives-in-the-bmw-hydrogen-7/comment-page-1/#comment-11135</link>
		<dc:creator>e46 led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carzi.com/2007/06/06/brad-pitt-arrives-in-the-bmw-hydrogen-7/#comment-11135</guid>
		<description>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#039;t enjoy it. Maybe if it ended up closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less costly, and had a really good I4 (turboed or not, I do not care) then I would prefer it greater, but whatever. What frustrated me further was the predictable M model that could of course be termed the M1. I felt that it just wouldn&#039;t be right to measure up the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series first showed in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#039;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. Greater to manufacture a decent, or perhaps marvelous, car than to not come up with it at all just because a heap of fanboys may get damaged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#8217;t enjoy it. Maybe if it ended up closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less costly, and had a really good I4 (turboed or not, I do not care) then I would prefer it greater, but whatever. What frustrated me further was the predictable M model that could of course be termed the M1. I felt that it just wouldn&#8217;t be right to measure up the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series first showed in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#8217;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. Greater to manufacture a decent, or perhaps marvelous, car than to not come up with it at all just because a heap of fanboys may get damaged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
