<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW M Double Clutch Transmission Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/</link>
	<description>Cool Automotive News From Around The World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:25:01 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: e46 led</title>
		<link>http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>e46 led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carzi.com/?p=4799#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#039;t desire it. Possibly if it ended up being closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less expensive, and had a very superb I4 (turboed or not, I don&#039;t care) then I would prefer it better, but whatever. What frustrated me further was the necessary M design which should really logically be called the M1. I thought that it just couldn&#039;t be suitable to measure up the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series came out in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#039;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. Greater to develop a good, or maybe stunning, vehicle rather than not make it at all just because a bunch of fanboys may get wounded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the 1 series came out, I didn&#8217;t desire it. Possibly if it ended up being closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, less expensive, and had a very superb I4 (turboed or not, I don&#8217;t care) then I would prefer it better, but whatever. What frustrated me further was the necessary M design which should really logically be called the M1. I thought that it just couldn&#8217;t be suitable to measure up the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series came out in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don&#8217;t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. Greater to develop a good, or maybe stunning, vehicle rather than not make it at all just because a bunch of fanboys may get wounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMW M Power Loosing It&#8217;s Charm? &#124; CarZi</title>
		<link>http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW M Power Loosing It&#8217;s Charm? &#124; CarZi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carzi.com/?p=4799#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>[...] BMW Posts GT Haus Modified Widebody Race BMW M3 BMW M Double Clutch Transmission Explained Jasmin Pacheco BIKINI Test Drive - BMW M3 (Video) e92 BMW M3 Race Version 2008 (PHOTOS) E92 BMW M3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BMW Posts GT Haus Modified Widebody Race BMW M3 BMW M Double Clutch Transmission Explained Jasmin Pacheco BIKINI Test Drive &#8211; BMW M3 (Video) e92 BMW M3 Race Version 2008 (PHOTOS) E92 BMW M3 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carzi.com/?p=4799#comment-5568</guid>
		<description>zrnfbqxuo3817wno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zrnfbqxuo3817wno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinay</title>
		<link>http://www.carzi.com/2008/09/02/bmw-m-double-clutch-transmission-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-4311</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carzi.com/?p=4799#comment-4311</guid>
		<description>Good Article, Anthony.  Audi has had their double-clutch tranny for a few years, and now that Nissan has theirs (GT-R) and Porsche&#039;s PDK is just around the corner, it is about time BMW switches their SMG trannys to double-clutch mechanisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article, Anthony.  Audi has had their double-clutch tranny for a few years, and now that Nissan has theirs (GT-R) and Porsche&#8217;s PDK is just around the corner, it is about time BMW switches their SMG trannys to double-clutch mechanisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
